College Democrats | University of Wisconsin - Madison

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Better than Rep. Frank Lasee's plan...
Orlando, Florida, initiated a "Kicks for Guns" program designed to get guns off the streets. Basically you turn in a gun, you get a pair of sneakers (or $50 gift certificates) - no questions asked. It's an annual program run in Orange County by the Sheriff's Dept and two local radio stations in hopes that they can cut into the city's violent crime problem.

Last year, the program recovered 116 guns (including 3 stolen ones... and a Tec 9 machine gun).

This year, over 310 guns were collected. Some were of great value, some were used only for hunting, some were historical relics, some were rusty, some were used in crimes. And one was a surface-to-air missile launcher.

The police will test-fire every gun (to match bullet rifling to unsolved crimes) and then destroyed.

While other states are getting guns off the streets, some brilliant minds in the Wisconsin legislature are trying to give them to schoolteachers (check out Rep. Lasee's blog) or allow people to carry concealed weapons. If it were up to me, I'd rather have the State pay $50 now instead of $50,000 later to prosecute a violent crime...

Labels:

posted by Suchita Shah at 9:31 PM 2 comments Post to DemWire

Another small step for women's reproductive rights
BBC News online reports today that Amnesty International has ended its "neutral" stance on abortion.

Amnesty International, an organization dedciated to "working to protect human rights worldwide," has previously been silent on whether or not they backed abortion, on cases even including rape and incest. As BBC reports, the decision was made in April by an executive council, and it was confirmed recently by their International Council Meeting in Mexico. The new policy of Amnesty International supports "access to abortion for women in cases of rape, incest, or violence, or where the pregnancy jeopardises a mother's life or health." As would be expected, many Christian organizations threatened to withdraw support from AI. A senior Vatican official even called on Catholics to stop funding AI, accusing it of "betraying its commitment to human rights." Amnesty International defends its position, "insisting it [is] upholding the ability of women to exercise their sexual and reproductive rights free from coercion and violence."

This is great news for women's rights worldwide. Yet, still in the US today, we are debating this issue. Why are we politicizing human rights? I think this goes beyond the moral question of what is a "life" and instead focuses on the more salient moral problem of violating an individual human's rights.

Why is there a difference between "women's rights" and "human rights?" I thought we got past this in 1972 with the Equal Rights Amendment. Oh wait... we still need 3 more states. Ok, well Supreme Court, how about actually applying Section 1 of the 14th Amendment?

Labels:

posted by Suchita Shah at 11:13 AM 1 comments Post to DemWire

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Iranian Unit to Be Labeled "Terrorist"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/14/AR2007081401662_pf.html

For those who don't wish to read the whole article, allow me to sum up:

Under Executive Order 13224, signed by President Bush two weeks after 9/11, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite military 125,000 strong is to be named a "specially designated global terrorist. This will allow the U.S. Government to target the Corps' "business operations and finances".

Do not confuse the Revolutionary Guard Corps for the regular Iranian Army. Think of it as a second, smaller armed forces. It has its own army, special forces, air force, and navy- these were the people who kidnapped 15 British sailors and marines this past spring. The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was a member of the Corps and worked his way up, and it is a prime base for support.

I cannot say that this makes me pleased, and it certainly doesn't make me feel safer. To name a group of militants that are not directly connected to a state (Al-Qaida) as terrorists is one thing. To name a recognized branch of another nation's armed forces as such is something else. It's my opinion that this is as close to war as you can get without actually declaring it.

Now, I am no supporter of the current Iranian government, not at all. Ahmadinejad is untrustworthy, belligerent, and a thorn in the side of America. But now is not the time to, in essence, declare war on Iran (while the Bush administration will certainly not call it that, I can't imagine that Iran would see it as anything else). Our troops are stretched as is, fighting in Afghanistan (remember that place? We were looking for some guy named Osama...) and Iraq. To open a third front would be simply irresponsible, and a threat not only to the safety of the troops, but to America's standing in the world, and the safety of her people worldwide.

The government needs to tread very carefully, and for the reason that nuclear proliferation expert Joseph Cirincione cited: "Sanctions can serve as a prod, but they have very rarely forced a country to capitulate or collapse. All of us want to back Iran into a corner, but we want to give them a way out, too. [The designation] will convince many in Iran's elite that there's no point in talking with us and that the only thing that will satisfy us is regime change."

The hard work that has taken months, if not years, to establish at least cool relations (certainly not friendly) with Iran could quickly be dismantled if we go about this the wrong way. Show too little force, Iran will not take us seriously. Show too much force, and I don't think they'll have issue with pushing right back. We must avoid more war, but we must take the correct actions to ensure peace. But given this administration's track record, I don't see how this new action will not lead to armed conflict between the U.S. and Iran.

Looks like the Bush Administration wants to go out with a bang.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Paul Axel at 11:29 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Monday, August 13, 2007

Deputy Chief of Staff Rove to Resign
The Washington Post Announced this morning that Deputy Chief of Staff and senior advisor Karl Rove will resign effective at the end of the month. Mr. Rove was the architect of both of the President's campaigns and was often criticized by Democrats for politicizing parts of the Executive Branch previously off-limits to that kind of pandering.

You can read the Post's full story here.
posted by Oliver Kiefer at 6:11 AM 1 comments Post to DemWire


The views and opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the UW-Madison College Democrats. They are the views of their authors. Postings by individual board members to not necessarily represent a consensus opinion of the board or organization.