College Democrats | University of Wisconsin - Madison

Friday, June 15, 2007

Ethanol, Stricter Fuel Standards Gaining Strength
The Washington Post featured a story today about H.R. 6, the Energy Act of 2007. The bill proposes a number of new provisions relating to clean and renewable energy sources. It's not likely to be something Al Gore would be particularly proud of, but it is a start. You can read the article here.

Question: What are your thoughts on ethanol? It will certainly help the Midwestern economy and begin to reduce dependence on foreign oil (if the pace of ethanol can keep up with increasing demand for gas), but how much environmental difference will it make? How do we tackle this huge problem?
posted by Oliver Kiefer at 6:29 AM 4 comments Post to DemWire

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

President Bush goes to The Hill
The President went to Capitol Hill today to attend the weekly luncheon of Republican Senators, attempting to revive the immigration bill that stalled in the Senate last week. His visit yielded little success, as conservatives refused to give in on immigration policy before border security increases.

The Washington Post has an article detailing the day here.

I guess I see myself caught in the middle of this one. On the one hand, I think that we need to make sure that our borders are secure. I have no problem with immigrants, but let's allow more legal ones and try to cut down on the people risking their lives to make it across.

On the other hand, we've gotta give these hard working people a break. We're taught to "Do onto others, as you would have them do onto you." Let's face it, immigrants work the jobs that few of us would ever consider doing, and for that they need some assistance. Yes, they should be legal residents and taxpayers, but they should also be able to have their kids attend schools and have care available to them in hospitals, etc.

Just my two cents on the issue. Any thoughts?
posted by Oliver Kiefer at 7:01 PM 4 comments Post to DemWire

Monday, June 11, 2007

Democratic Presidential Debate Analysis Part II
Alright, now I finally have a half hour to finish watching...

So summing up briefly:

A high school kid asked about the draft, whether every one should have to do some form of national service. All candidates propose some sort of financial incentives for service but nothing mandatory. Nothing too controversial.

A guy asked what the candidates' definitions of "rich" were in terms of their proposals to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the rich. Obama defined it as $250,000/year, stressing that it would only be going back to Clintonian level taxes, nothing confiscatory. Edwards said $200,000/year and also brought up his universal college program for those who graduate from high school with decent grades and work 10 hours a week.

Another guy asked how to deal with the deficit. Richardson mentions how he had to balance the budget every year as governor and (unwisely) highlighted his support for things like a balanced budget amendment and a line-item veto. Obviously everyone wanted to cut earmarks and corporate welfare. Richardson also, annoyingly, called himself a "pro-growth Democrat," implying the others are what, anti-growth Democrats?
Kucinich talked about ending the war, getting out of trade deals, health care for all, and creating environmentally friendly jobs. Not so sure how the last three are supposed to reduce the deficit but whatever...

Would candidates vow to veto all spending bills containing earmarks as president? Dodd wouldn't support a blanket ban. Gravel went off on the other candidates again for supporting expansions of programs with huge looming fiscal disaster on the horizon. I guess there you have it: don't expect any expansion of health care coverage under President Gravel. He's really not worth my commentary though, he's just ridiculously unhinged in all these debates. Biden was absolutely right, if you really wanted to get rid of earmarks you'd implement public financing of elections.

What to do in your first 100 days in office? Edwards would travel the world to reestablish respect for America...he kind of forgot to say end the Iraq war unfortunately, which of course Obama and Clinton mentioned. Richardson had some smart education proposals like universal preschool, full-day kindergarten, and a minimum wage for teachers. Dodd would restore constitutional rights.

And there you have it! I don't think it really changed the dynamics of the race. I hope there's more excitement and less "packaged" rhetoric in future debates.
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 7:37 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire


The views and opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the UW-Madison College Democrats. They are the views of their authors. Postings by individual board members to not necessarily represent a consensus opinion of the board or organization.