College Democrats | University of Wisconsin - Madison

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Nuns, Students Lack Adequate ID, Get Turned Away From Polls
The latest Supreme Court decision affirming Indiana's right to disenfranchise thousands of low-income, elderly, minority, and student residents already shows itself to be a massive success in today's election.

Update: Jeffery Toobin just broke into the endless campaign talking points on CNN to mention the fact that Lake County, the one county still outstanding preventing networks from calling the Indiana election (by holding back all their returns till they count their absentees) is "innappropriate." He noted the pattern of Indiana only allowing polls open till 6 pm (not enough time for a lot of working people to get to the polls after work, most states keep them open till 8 pm) and of course the Supreme Court voter-ID decision. Since Lake is in the Chicago media market, he said its reminiscent of the days of the Chicago Democratic machine when voting authorities would figure out how many votes they needed and they'd "find the votes" to rig elections. So rarely do cable commentators comment on the shameful history (and current manifestations) of election fraud in this country and I give him mad props for doing so.
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 7:48 PM 1 comments Post to DemWire

And This is Why Open Primaries Make No Sense
Indy Star:
Sales representative Bob Rose selected a Democrat ballot with the general election in mind.

Rose said he voted for Hillary Clinton and Jill Long Thompson, the other Democrat running for governor. Rose said he supports Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels and things Long Thompson will be a weaker opponent.

It was clear that voters in this staunch Republican area were crossing over in the primary.

One of probably a dozen such anecdotes in this article.
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 11:37 AM 0 comments Post to DemWire

The Expectations Game
Hillary Clinton's inner circle now fears a stinging defeat is likely in North Carolina.

"Look, we worked hard and gave it our best shot, but the demographics, well, they are what they are," a top campaign source explained to the DRUDGE REPORT as voting began Tuesday morning.

The campaign now believes a 15 point loss, or more, would not be surprising. Her team will work hard throughout the day to lower all expectations in North Carolina.

What if Barack Obama's campaign had said this about Pennsylvania? Well that would have been offending "real people"! White working class voters! Whose interests are paramount in today's political discourse. Blacks and latte-drinking liberal elitists, after all, are not real people.

Isn't Hillary Clinton the one who needs to drastically catch up in the delegate count? Why is Obama expected to transcend demographic realities while it's completely normal for Clinton to receive 10% of the black vote?

What is with this fetishization of the white working class?

Update: And really, the Clinton people would be ok with losing by 15 points? Even though the polls only show Obama up by 7.3% in NC?

Update 2: How did Clinton go from being an unelectable "feminazi" hated by vast swaths of America's common folk (who will turn out en masse to defeat her if she is the nominee) to the socially conservative voice of the white working class who is clearly far more electable than the America-hating Obama? Just goes to show the extent to which Republicans still have the power to shape the media narratives to benefit their electoral interests.

Update 3: Hahaha I've never been a big Halperin fan but this is right on.

Update 4: Wow, this guy understands American politics.
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 7:21 AM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Monday, May 05, 2008

The Pander Bear
I think it would be appropriate to have a dialogue about Hillary's recent endorsement of a gas tax suspension for the summer.

I don't usually take political positions as indicators of a politician's beliefs, and I am usually the first to assume the worst motives for any statement made by public figures, either Republican or Democratic. For me, Democrats are always better than Republicans because they pander the way I want them to, which is why I will probably always vote Democratic no matter how incompetent or worthless I think the guy/gal on the ticket is.

But for some reason Hillary's recent support of the gas tax suspension struck me as too transparent and pathetic to forgive. Of course, what is even more sad is that she and other politicians--Obama probably included--regularly pander at even greater cost (the Iraq War, the Iran resolutions, the Patriot Act).

The sad day for me will come when I finally discover that Russ Feingold does the same thing.
posted by Jack Craver at 2:50 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Sunday, May 04, 2008

Prescient Wisdom
McCain wants to stay in Iraq until no more Americans are getting killed, no matter how long it takes and how many Americans get killed achieving that goal--that is, the goal of not getting any more Americans killed. And once that goal is achieved, we'll stay.

-Hendrik Hertzberg, The New Yorker

This quote is several months old but perhaps it's one of the best descriptions of the fundamental problem with McCain's Iraq strategy. It seems particularly apt as McCain claims the DNC is misrepresenting his desire for an endless presence in the Middle East in this ad.

But as you can see yourselves, the context of the quote, provided by Hertzberg, doesn't make it any better. Iraq is not going to become South Korea any time soon, and Americans don't want to wait around until it does just so we can spend another 100 years spending billions of dollars occupying the place, and continuing to rub salt in the wounds of Islamic nationalism.
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 2:03 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Friday, May 02, 2008

The Post amazes again...
Check out the Washington Post's in-depth profile of Sen. Obama's senior adviser, David Alexrod. The photo of Mr. Axelrod looking mysteriously like Doc Graham from "Field of Dreams" sets the heartwarming and inspiring tone of the article.

In a long, drawn-out, and increasingly ugly campaign, it sometimes is hard to remember why we worked so hard in weeks and months leading up to February. Recently, the prospects for hope and change have been dragged through the mud of politics as usual.
So do we settle for what we know, what will never deliver our dreams but what we know is safe? Or do we yearn for something more, and work tirelessly day-in and day-out to make that dream a reality?

It is so inevitably a choice that belongs to us, no matter how much we might wish to shrug it off. Is it possible for the people of our generation to believe in a politics that we have not seen in our lifetime? Is it possible for those of our parents' and grandparents' generations to remember back to the days of John and Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and believe that once again, at the beginning of the 21st century, there time has come?

Mr. Axelrod is an example of an ordinary person who worked extraordinarily hard and made politics in our country better. If he can not only survive, but flourish up against the divisiveness of Washington, what's to suggest that we can't?
posted by Oliver Kiefer at 10:49 AM 1 comments Post to DemWire

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Hillary's Contacts
In Anthro lecture right now. A guest lecturer just informed us that all presidents since Nixon have had blue eyes (since people have had color TVs).

Interestingly, he said, Hillary Clinton doesn't have blue eyes but she wears blue contact lenses. Hmm..

Thought that would be a good first post in a long time.
posted by Jack Craver at 9:33 AM 4 comments Post to DemWire

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

MAKE IT END!!
Couldn't agree more. I think Fox News needs to start an hour-long "Wright Watch" program that can enlighten evening news audiences on the day's breaking Reverend Wright offensive, angry, black power shenanigans. Or maybe they should call it "Reverend Wright says the Darndest Things?"
posted by Ryan Greenfield at 2:22 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Monday, April 28, 2008

Fareed Zakaria on John McCain's Foreign Policy Vision
Fareed Zakaria has a bit to say about John McCain's foreign policy speech from back in March.
On March 26, McCain gave a speech on foreign policy in Los Angeles that was billed as his most comprehensive statement on the subject. It contained within it the most radical idea put forward by a major candidate for the presidency in 25 years. Yet almost no one noticed.

In his speech McCain proposed that the United States expel Russia from the G8, the group of advanced industrial countries. Moscow was included in this body in the 1990s to recognize and reward it for peacefully ending the cold war on Western terms, dismantling the Soviet empire and withdrawing from large chunks of the old Russian Empire as well. McCain also proposed that the United States should expand the G8 by taking in India and Brazil—but pointedly excluded China from the councils of power.
Go read the whole thing; Zakaria does a great job of showing just why McCain's is such a reckless idea. I had no idea that McCain had suggested this, but I (like Zakaria) cannot foresee an upside to alienating other nuclear powers while protecting nuclear materials is such a key component of the War on Terror. Of course, McCain's problems sorting out Iraq's factions suggests an already poor grasp of the forces at work in the war, but that's a subject for another time.
posted by Micah Lanier at 2:03 PM 0 comments Post to DemWire

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Obama gets his version of McCain's Paxson lobbyist scandal
Obama supporters who bashed McCain on his Paxson ties, it seems Obama is vulnerable to the same line of criticism. Obama's Blackwell ties are eerily similar to McCain's problem with Paxson (where McCain wrote a letter to the FCC favoring Paxson's economic position, possibly influenced by Paxson's employee campaign donations or lobbyists):

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-killerspin27apr27,1,2764345.story


Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. paid Obama an $8,000-a-month retainer to give legal advice to his growing technology firm, Electronic Knowledge Interchange. It allowed Obama to supplement his $58,000 part-time state Senate salary for over a year with regular payments from Blackwell's firm that eventually totaled $112,000.

A few months after receiving his final payment from EKI, Obama sent a request on state Senate letterhead urging Illinois officials to provide a $50,000 tourism promotion grant to another Blackwell company, Killerspin.

Killerspin specializes in table tennis, running tournaments nationwide and selling its own line of equipment and apparel and DVD recordings of the competitions. With support from Obama, other state officials and an Obama aide who went to work part time for Killerspin, the company eventually obtained $320,000 in state grants between 2002 and 2004 to subsidize its tournaments.


Obama's staff said the senator advocated only for the first year's grant -- which ended up being $20,000, not $50,000. The day after Obama wrote his letter urging the awarding of the state funds, Obama's U.S. Senate campaign received a $1,000 donation from Blackwell.

Obama's presidential campaign rejects any suggestion that there was a connection between the legal work, the campaign contribution and the help with the grant. "Any implication that Sen. Obama would risk an ethical breach in order to secure a small grant for a pingpong tournament is nuts," said David Axelrod, Obama's chief political advisor.

I will give Obama and McCain the benefit of the doubt that they did nothing wrong here, but Obama's Blackwell ties and McCain's Paxson ties are both likely to be targeted as we approach November. I wouldn't be surprised to see ads involving either issue running in Wisconsin in the coming months... After all, Paxson and Blackwell don't run too great with both candidates' self-professed "reformer" images.
posted by David Lapidus at 11:32 AM 0 comments Post to DemWire

9/3/06 - 9/10/06 9/10/06 - 9/17/06 9/17/06 - 9/24/06 9/24/06 - 10/1/06 10/1/06 - 10/8/06 10/8/06 - 10/15/06 10/15/06 - 10/22/06 10/22/06 - 10/29/06 10/29/06 - 11/5/06 11/5/06 - 11/12/06 11/12/06 - 11/19/06 11/19/06 - 11/26/06 11/26/06 - 12/3/06 12/3/06 - 12/10/06 12/10/06 - 12/17/06 12/17/06 - 12/24/06 12/24/06 - 12/31/06 12/31/06 - 1/7/07 1/7/07 - 1/14/07 1/14/07 - 1/21/07 1/21/07 - 1/28/07 1/28/07 - 2/4/07 2/4/07 - 2/11/07 2/11/07 - 2/18/07 2/18/07 - 2/25/07 2/25/07 - 3/4/07 3/4/07 - 3/11/07 3/18/07 - 3/25/07 3/25/07 - 4/1/07 4/1/07 - 4/8/07 4/8/07 - 4/15/07 4/15/07 - 4/22/07 4/22/07 - 4/29/07 4/29/07 - 5/6/07 5/6/07 - 5/13/07 5/13/07 - 5/20/07 5/20/07 - 5/27/07 5/27/07 - 6/3/07 6/3/07 - 6/10/07 6/10/07 - 6/17/07 6/17/07 - 6/24/07 6/24/07 - 7/1/07 7/1/07 - 7/8/07 7/8/07 - 7/15/07 7/15/07 - 7/22/07 7/22/07 - 7/29/07 7/29/07 - 8/5/07 8/5/07 - 8/12/07 8/12/07 - 8/19/07 8/19/07 - 8/26/07 8/26/07 - 9/2/07 9/2/07 - 9/9/07 9/9/07 - 9/16/07 9/16/07 - 9/23/07 9/23/07 - 9/30/07 9/30/07 - 10/7/07 10/7/07 - 10/14/07 10/14/07 - 10/21/07 10/21/07 - 10/28/07 10/28/07 - 11/4/07 11/4/07 - 11/11/07 11/11/07 - 11/18/07 11/18/07 - 11/25/07 11/25/07 - 12/2/07 12/2/07 - 12/9/07 12/9/07 - 12/16/07 12/16/07 - 12/23/07 12/23/07 - 12/30/07 12/30/07 - 1/6/08 1/6/08 - 1/13/08 1/13/08 - 1/20/08 1/20/08 - 1/27/08 1/27/08 - 2/3/08 2/3/08 - 2/10/08 2/10/08 - 2/17/08 2/17/08 - 2/24/08 2/24/08 - 3/2/08 3/2/08 - 3/9/08 3/9/08 - 3/16/08 3/16/08 - 3/23/08 3/23/08 - 3/30/08 3/30/08 - 4/6/08 4/6/08 - 4/13/08 4/13/08 - 4/20/08 4/20/08 - 4/27/08 4/27/08 - 5/4/08 5/4/08 - 5/11/08

 Subscribe in a reader   Download the blog feed Dashboard Widget


The views and opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the UW-Madison College Democrats. They are the views of their authors. Postings by individual board members to not necessarily represent a consensus opinion of the board or organization.